On my run yesterday I went past a building site where the scaffolding was wrapped in plastic. You see it more and more these days. It makes a lot of sense. I guess it makes conditions better for workers, can extend the weather conditions in which work can be done, protects exposed materials (such as wood and fresh paintwork) and so on.
All told, a brilliant idea. Innovative - also, it's not super high tech. Scaffolding has been around hundreds of years and plastic wrapping at least 40. In fact, in building there are innovations all the time. Sometimes they aren't good: mix plaster monolithic cladding with untreated timber, for example. However, over time they have been nothing short of revolutionary. Decade after decade there are smarter, cheaper, lighter, more varied, more interesting, more attractive, more secure, more environmentally friendly, and easier ways of doing things in building.
It's even more impressive when you think that homebuilding isn't exactly considered to be a 'hot' industry.
It's a good comparison with life insurance because the ideal target markets are similar. The biggest segment of the industry serves families. Mainly families with children.
But in the life insurance business innovation has been nothing like as good. We've had income protection and trauma cover. Don't try to tell me that adding Human Variant CJD to Trauma Cover counts as innovation either. That doesn't even rank with windscreen wipers in my book (a device that seems to have been developed by several people at once in different places, but in a recognisably workable form in 1903, by the way).
Compare the industry with some of our financial cousins (say, sharebroking) and it's even worse.
E-apps are just beginning to make an impact now in our life market. The London Stock Exchange moved from an 'open outcry' system of handling trades to screen-based trading. Get this... on October 27, 1986. That's more than 30 years ago. I reckon it will be at least 50 years before we get rid of paper apps.
Just recently I was shown a chart which describes something so obvious that it shouldn't be cool to write it down any more. It's the chart behind the proposal to develop every 'adviser desktop' that I've ever seen (like the universal growth chart that's used by every internet business during it's IPO) and it is no less vaid for being familiar. Here you go:

This is but one issue. There are a number of others - major ones - we could focus on. Marketing problems, document problems (paper documents? huh?). Almost neolithic documentation of variations (have you ever seen a really well-presented endorsement?). Errors in data. Claims processing and data management. You name it, we've got problems with it.
I know that wherever there are unique transactions - especially one which involves so much non-standard data, there will be problems. I merely wish to point out to those wondering whether there is much scope for innovation that there is - plenty - it jsut might not lie with finding a new scary, and crucially rare, medical condition and adding it for no cost to the Trauma product.
Recent Comments